Thursday, 18 June 2015

Major General Sir Denis Pack


  Major General Sir Denis Pack was the commander of the 9th British Brigade at the Battle of Waterloo, which consisted of the 3/1st Royal Scots, 2/44th East Essex, 1/42nd Black Watch and the 1/92nd Gordon Highlanders. I was hoping to a more detailed account of his life and career but that will have to wait. Suffice to say, his brigade fought very hard during the battle, suffering heavy casualties so much so that they had to be ordered to halt when Wellington ordered the general advance after the defeat of the Guard. In the meantime, enjoy these pictures.



Waterloo


  200 years since the great battle. I wish I could have taken part in the re-enactment but alas I could not go. Still, I have plenty of Napoleonics on the workbench. I shall hopefully have the 2nd Battalion of the 44th done soon, although I have found that I have had very little time to paint lately but I pray that will change.
  It is good that there are commemorations for the battle going on today. this battle was a key part of the history of not just these Isles, but of Europe and the world. I shall be watching the 1970 film 'Waterloo' later, a great film and deeply moving, particularly towards the end when Wellington surveys the battle and makes his famous comment:

                                       "Next to a battle lost, the saddest thing is a battle won."

                                       Sir Denis Pack, commander of the British 9th Brigade

Thursday, 12 June 2014

Review: Wargames Factory American Revolution British Infantry, Part One


  Yesterday, I took delivery of the new set of British infantry from Wargames Factory. I have never bought figures made by this company so I wasn't too sure what to expect. The box the figures come in is made of very hard cardboard and the artwork on the front looks a lot like a scene from the Mel Gibson film'The Patriot', namely the scene that is meant to depict the Battle of Camden but, in usual Hollywood style, takes artistic license with the facts. 


  The back cover gives some generic information about what is in the set, mainly that there are thirty figures in all, and that the figures are in the 1768 regulation uniform. This is the standard uniform that many people associate with the redcoat of the American Revolution i.e. Tricorne, long tailed redcoat, short black gaiters etc. In reality, as the war progressed the British army adopted various changes to their uniform, varying from regiment to regiment. Many wore round hats with large plumes in them to swat away flies, cut the tails of their redcoats short (or even wore a simple redcoat with no lace) and adopted gaiter-trousers. However, the soldiers that fought in the early battles such as Bunker Hill would in all probability wore the regulation kit. As Perry Miniatures have already released a set of British infantry to cover the later war era, this set nicely fills the gap.


  On the side of the box, one can see three further sets that are due to be released; American Continentals, Colonial Militia and Woodland Indians. Apparently a further two sets of troops are due to be released. My guess would be that these are either going to be two artillery sets or will cover the foreign troops involved in the war, most likely the Hessians and the French.




  Inside the box there are four sprues, one for the command and three for the rank and file. The command sprue contains six figures, two officers (one of which comes in two pieces, allowing you to create an officer either with the regulation long tails or the shorter tails adopted on campaign), two colour bearers a drummer and a NCO. 
  

  The figures come with various accouterments. There are four arms with pistols for the officers and a few others with swords. One criticism I have is the lack of poses. The two officer figures have the same pose, with the figure leaning on his right leg whilst both of the ensigns are marching. I think some variation would have been nice, maybe one officer  marching and one ensign standing so if you bought another box you could have two ensigns standing, which would make more sense if the regiment had halted and was firing on the enemy. The ensigns wouldn't be advancing at that point! Considering that most of the line infantry poses are either firing or reloading I'm not sure why they designed both ensigns to be advancing, as well as the drummer and the NCO. 
  That aside they do look rather nice. I won't be able to give a fair assessment until I have assembled them but the sculpting on these figures is crisp and the details can be seen rather well. The officers even have gorgets which look rather nice. I will delve into more detail about the command at a later date.


  The next two sprues contain twenty four line infantry, twelve on each. Again, the sculpting is nice and clear. I think this is where the set really excels. The Perry's set (the only other plastic British set for this conflict) only has two options, charging or advancing at trial, this set allows you to create a proper firing line. I have already assembled about half a dozen of these and they look brilliant. They really do mirror the proper regulation commands of the era and look like a proper disciplined unit. As a reenactor, I can confirm the soldiers look accurate in their drill poses, it pretty much mirrors the illustrations seen in drill books of the time.
  This box set also has an advantage over the Perry's set in that you have four head options; regulation tricornes, roundhats, bearskins (for Grenadiers) and Light Infantry caps (for the Light Bobs), whereas the Perry's set only allows you to build line infantry in tricornes although you do get the option to build them with the Saratoga caps as well as roundhats. I think this is where this set might do well in that you have the option to create the flank companies as well as the line infantry. 




  The detail on the faces is really good. I am afraid my camera work doesn't really do them much justice. The tricornes are a bit fiddly in that the front is attached to the head, but the middle and back parts of the tricorne have to be attached separately, and, as far as I can see,  have to correspond with the correct figure. I wonder if it would have been easier if they had simply cast the tricorne with the head in one piece. This could have perhaps allowed more room for other head options (I haven't checked, but I don't think there are enough roundhats for all of the figures and only about a third can be made up as flank company figures). That aside, the detail is lovely and I think the tricornes on these plastics are much nicer than the Perry's ones, which feel to be a little flat to me. Then again, the Perry's ones are late war figures so will naturally look different.


  The last sprue contains twenty six bases (the command sprue contains another four). They look quite good but as I use the  'British Grenadier!' rule-set, which recommends basing figures in fours or sixes, I will not be using these. Still, they may find a use for my other figures.



  Also included is a handy colour coded guide. This shows you how to assemble the figures and how to create the various poses (firing, reloading, making ready etc.) although, as it states, this is only a guide and you can experiment with the poses. One side shows the guide for the command sprue and the other for the line sprue. I think having it colour coded is a good idea as it allows you to better see which parts go where. I remember buying the early Perry miniatures British Napoleonic set some years ago and getting a little confused as to what arms whet where at times as it wasn't as clearly displayed. However, looking a the recent Perry guides I would say they have an advantage over the Wargames Factory ones in that they also include rough painting guides and pictures of what the assembled figures should look like. True, there are some on the box, but it would be nice if in a future release they included a few more pictures and a few more painting guides (I noticed a few errors on the box in that they give the figures blue facings but the front cover has the regiments with the Colours of a White/Red faced regiment and the back picture with those of a Black faced Regiment!) Still, it is very useful for one such as myself.


  Here is a comparison of an already assembled figure next to some of the competition. From left to right are; Perry's plastic British, Perry's Metal American, Wargames Factory British, Wargames Foundry British and Eureka Miniatures American. I'm afraid the picture isn't the best but the Wargames Factory figure is the biggest of the figures. He is not that much bigger than his Perry Miniatures Plastic counterpart, although the Factory ones seem a little thinner than the Perry's one. Strangely enough, the Perry's metal figure is slightly smaller than the Perry's Plastic! I think these figures will mix alright with the Perry Miniatures Plastic range but they do look a little bigger than the Perry, Foundry and Eureka metals. I probably wouldn't mix them with the metals but with the Perry's plastics you should be alright. It might be a good idea to use these figures as Grenadiers as they will look larger than the metals. However, the muskets are a lot longer than those of the other manufacturers so they may look even more incompatible standing next to each other.
  In terms of value, I bought these for about £15, although they have now gone up to £18. The latter figure works out at about 60p per figure. The Perry's figures were until recently I believe about £18 but have gone up to £20 (I still remember the days when they were £12!) which works out at about 52p/53p per figure so you do get a little bit more value for you money from the Perry's, although I preorderd my Wargames Factory figures so that worked out at about 50p per figure for me. Nevertheless, these are still good value (and much better value my I add than, in my humble opinion, the extortionate amount Games Workshop charges for their Lord of the Rings Range. where their infantry alone is about £2.50 per figure!)
  So far so good, I would solidly rate these as excellent.They are excellently detailed and are good value. My only real quibble is the command sprue but there are plenty of other options out there to mix and match with.
  I will do a part two of this review when I have painted and based a few of them and see how well they look to the others I have already painted and will then give an overall summing up. In the meantime, I leave you with this present North Star gave me when I bought the figures.

Wednesday, 3 July 2013

Napoleon and his staff: work so far


  I've been busy painting Napoleonic figures for the Wargame that I'm hopefully going to run next week using the General de Brigade rules. I've decided to make up a command vignette for Napoleon inspired by the one on Tarleton's Quarter, although mine lacks his personal escort. Apart from Marengo (Napoleon's horse) the figures are virtually complete, it's just a matter of finishing off the terrain on the base which, due to its size, is going to take a while. In the meantime, here are some more pictures of the command set at the moment.
Marshall Ney and Drouet, Comte d'Erlon, looking at a map of the situation

Colonel Gourgaud and an officer from the 7th Hussars

From the Allied army, the Prince of Orange and a British staff officer from the 1st Foot Guards.

The 1st Regiment of Grenadiers of the Guard

Some Beja tribesmen for the Sudan 1881-1885

The Beja from another angle. I have some Naval Brigade and British infantry on order

Sunday, 12 May 2013

Major General Sir Edward Packenham



    I have finally managed to complete the figure for Major General Sir Edward Packenham (1778-1815). The man himself had a fairly distinguished career, serving in Ireland, Denmark, the Caribbean, the Peninsular (where he was made a general) and, most famously, in America. After his death at the battle of New Orleans in January 1815, his brother-in-law, the Duke of Wellington, wrote that "We have but one consolation, that he fell as he lived, in the honourable discharge of his duty and distinguished as a soldier and a man".


  I've finally got a new camera (my old one has died after about six years of service) so forgive me for any blurriness as I'm still trying it out. The figures of Packenham and his ADC are from Front Rank; I love the style of them and they were a joy to paint. I've never been very good at horses but I think these ones have come out better that previous attempts.
  I've gone for the Peninsular look on the bases (lighter grass and more desert looking soil than my other figures) although I'm not sure about the trousers as grey trousers were normally worn in Northern Europe as opposed to the warmer climates of Spain, but Packenham will suffice and can be used to represent any General that I need for the time being.


  Also presented here is the colour party of the 92nd (Gordon) Highlanders. They are yet to receive their new colours (the old ones that came with theses Victrix figures needed replacing) and the drummer needs a new drum but at least it is a beginning! I need to paint a battalion of the 92nd and 42nd Highlanders (30 figures each) as well as the rest of my army. Along with exams in June, I think I'll be kept busy!




Monday, 4 February 2013

Richard III found!


  Certainly a major day today as the remains found in a car park in Leicester in September of last year have been formally identified as those of King Richard III. A part of me does feel a little sorry for Richard; true he most likely had his two nephews, King Edward V (12) and Richard, Duke of York (10) murdered in the Tower of London and did eliminate other opponents to his position (most notably Lord Hastings) but in an era of instability was this necessarily a bad thing given the circumstances? From a modern perspective it is without a doubt a crime but it can be argued that Richard was merely serving the interests of his country.
  History, as has been constantly said, has been unkind to Richard III, Shakespeare vilified him as a hunchback who plotted and murdered his way to the throne, but in reality, apart from his taking of power, he was an exemplar king who was one of his brothers, King Edward IV, most loyal subjects back when he was Duke of Gloucester.
  Due to the shortness of his reign, we will never know entirely how good a king he would have been, but hints do come across in his donations to the church and his prowess as a battlefield commander. History is written by the winners and had he won the Battle of Bosworth in 1485, then English history would have been remarkably different (no Tudors, potentially no reformation etc. although this is all conjecture). I may be sounding like a bit of a massive supporter of Richard. I not an ardent supporter, I just like to see a bit of balance and today's news means that he can, quite literally, finally be laid to rest. True, there hasn't been any new evidence come to light in regards to his murdering of the two princes but the crime happened so long ago that it will, in my opinion, be impossible to find out what happened. In the meantime, we can at least bury the last Plantagenet monarch of England in peace.

Sunday, 23 December 2012

Projects in the Pipeline

  Well, here is an update of what I've doing at the moment in terms of wargaming. First up is Fort William Henry/ Fort (insert french name). I am planning to use this for the French and Indian Wargame as Fort William Henry and also as a French fort. To do this, I have come up with the idea of having different flag poles with different flags on them that I can switch around when I want the fort to change ownership. This idea was inspired by these two blogs: http://jayswargamingmadness.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Fort%20William%20Henry
http://www.shedwars.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/the-colonels-daughters.html
  The fort I'm building is nowhere near as good as the one on the first blog! I'm afraid I don't have any pictures of the fort at the moment, I will post pictures when it is nearer to completion.
  Some things I do have pictures of though are my Napoleonic figures. The first figures I bought were a set of British and a set of French Infantry from Perry's about three years ago. Since then I've collected the Imperial Guard and Highlander sets from Victrix and the French Hussars from Perry. Most of these figures are still lying in the lead (or plastic) pile. I'm hoping to use these for a Napoleonic wargame using General de Brigade some time in the future and have based the figures according to those rules (or from what I gather as I don't have a copy of the rules- yet!).
The Command stand for the 3rd Foot Guards. My aim is to build up the Guards Brigade as they were at the Battle of Talavera, comprising the 1/1st Foot Guards and the 1/3rd Guards, along with a company of the 5/60th Royal American Rifles.

The Light Company of the 1/1st Guards. The rules suggest (or so I gather) that on a 6 figure unit. each rank of three represents a company. As the Guards had more men than a line regiment though (average regiment was between 500-700 men, the Guards had between 1000-1200) I've decided to make the flank companies larger. In the future, I plan to get more men to make the whole regiment larger.

Rear view of the Light Company. From what I've found, the 1/1st had brownish coloured  Knapsacks (backpacks) with the symbol of their regiment on whilst the 1/3rd has Black Knapsacks with their symbol on.

The Colour of the 9th company. The Guards had (and still have as far as I'm aware) a different system of colours to the rest of the army. Unlike each line regiment, which had a regimental colour and a kings colour, the Guards had a colour for each senior officer (Colonel, Lt Colonel and Major) which were red, and a colour for each company, which had the Union Jack with various symbols. The 1/3rd Guards took the colour of the 9th company (shown above) with them during this time and was their colour at Talavera. 

The Regimental Colour of the 3rd Foot Guards. From their formation in the mid 17th Century until the 1720's they were known as the Scots Guards, hence why the Lion of Scotland is present. in the 1830's, William IV granted them the title of Scots Fusilier Guards, which they have held ever since.


A rear view of the 5/60th Royal Americans. Sorry I don't have a better image of them, the camera has been playing up lately.
  I will try to make more progress on the Napoleonics, but I fear that I will be having to forsake work on them for the French and Indian War figures that I should have coming for Christmas. Anyway, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!